Quotations and Misquotations

Quotations and Misquotations

Carbon , Radiometric Dating and Index Fossils Carbon dating is used to determine the age of biological artifacts up to 50, years old. This technique is widely used on recent artifacts, but educators and students alike should note that this technique will not work on older fossils like those of the dinosaurs alleged to be millions of years old. This technique is not restricted to bones; it can also be used on cloth, wood and plant fibers. Carbon dating has been used successfully on the Dead Sea Scrolls, Minoan ruins and tombs of the pharaohs among other things. Carbon is a radioactive isotope of carbon. The half-life of carbon is approximately 5, years. The short half-life of carbon means it cannot be used to date fossils that are allegedly extremely old, e. The question should be whether or not carbon can be used to date any artifacts at all? The answer is not simple. There are a few categories of artifacts that can be dated using carbon ; however, they cannot be more 50, years old.

Bandwidth Limit Exceeded

Also, to introduce students to the major time periods in earth’s history, as well as to the role fossils play in helping us understand this history. Context This lesson is based on an online booklet that provides an introduction to the study of earth’s history, published by the USGS. Using careful analogies and written historical records, the authors help students understand the development of the geologic time scale, including how this depended on gathering evidence and making comparisons.

The major time periods in earth’s history are introduced, as well as are fossils and the role they play in helping us understand this history.

Students learn about the development of the geologic time scale, the major time periods in earth’s history, and the role fossils play in this history.

Skip to Archean Backstop, 2. Here, I sketch the big picture in Colorado, as best I can put it together, from past to present. Subsequent sections will flesh out the details, also in chronological order. The mobile belt added to the continent during this time is known as the Colorado Province. Despite a long-standing intracontinental location, it’s been unstable ever since.

The assembly of the Colorado Province resembled in some respects the Early Proterozoic assembly of northeast Australia, which has changed little since then and therefore has a history much easier to unravel than Colorado’s oft-overprinted story. Buffalo Mountain Around 1. Colorado intrusive rocks with radiometric dates in the 1. Just Add Granite and Stir Mount Evans from Denver A large number of granitic intrusions , ductile shear zones, differential basement uplifts and rifts peppered the Colorado Province , along with the rest of the continent, in the Berthoud orogeny at 1.

Colorado’s many intrusive rocks with radiometric dates in the 1. The Berthoud and Grenville orogenies appear to have occurred in response to convergent plate interactions playing out far to the south. The many granitic intrusions at 1. Continental Crack-up Afar Region Rifting Over the long span of Proterozoic time, several major intracontinental rifting events repeatedly tried to pull the western two-thirds of the US apart, Colorado included, just as the East African Rift splits northeast Africa today.

Fossils and Geologic Time

Crustal Tectonic Plates and their movement How the Earth’s crust is split into large sections called tectonic plates is described. Their movement and effects at plate boundaries are explained e. Evidence to support the theory plate tectonic movement Wegener’s theory of continental drift is also described e. Tectonic Plates of the crust and their movement – unstoppable powerful plate tectonics! Introducing the basic ideas and evidence – see also section 9. What can happen when tectonic plates meet or part The ‘compact’ diagram Fig 2.

Carbon dating is used to determine the age of biological artifacts up to 50, years old. This technique is widely used on recent artifacts, but educators and students alike should note that this technique will not work on older fossils (like those of the dinosaurs alleged to be millions of years old).

Tiny pores on plant leaves and needles called stomata regulate carbon dioxide absorption and water vapor release. Stomata numbers decrease during times of high atmospheric CO2, and increase when atmospheric CO2 is low. The SI-CO2 relationship varies according to plant species, habitat altitude, and other factors. Correlation charts are constructed using modern plant specimens by determining their SI numbers and corresponding CO2 concentrations. When SI and CO2 ranges are fully characterized for a plant species, the charts are used as to estimate CO2 levels for related species in the geologic past.

To determine plant age Carbon14 methods are usually used to about 40, years ago. For older material, other dating methods are used. UC Berkeley; The story in the stomata Because plant stomata numbers do not change after the leaves or needles fall from the parent plant, they make a good indicator or proxy of atmospheric CO2 in Earth’s past. What they show is that the popular belief that CO2 levels prior to the Industrial Revolution were a steady ppm parts per million may be incorrect.

As illustrated below, studies of stomata for recent and fossilized plants show that atmospheric CO2 levels over the last 15, years have been higher and much more variable than previously supposed. Much of what we think we know about CO2 levels of the past , years is based on the ice core record. Recent stomata studies show that CO2 was more variable and the average CO2 concentrations have been significantly higher during our Holocene interglacial period last 11, years than are indicated by the ice core record.

Why have there been no human fossils found amongst dinosaur fossils?

A phenotypic characteristic, acquired during growth and development, that is not genetically based and therefore cannot be passed on to the next generation for example, the large muscles of a weightlifter. Any heritable characteristic of an organism that improves its ability to survive and reproduce in its environment. Also used to describe the process of genetic change within a population, as influenced by natural selection.

Dinosaurs became extinct about 65 million years ago, long before any humans existed. The reason why scientists who study dinosaurs reached this conclusion is radiometric dating of the rocks in which dinosaurs fossils are found.

Introduction What is a transitional fossil? The term “transitional fossil” is used at least two different ways on talk. I call these two meanings the “general lineage” and the “species-to-species transition”: This is a sequence of similar genera or families, linking an older group to a very different younger group. Each step in the sequence consists of some fossils that represent a certain genus or family, and the whole sequence often covers a span of tens of millions of years.

A lineage like this shows obvious morphological intermediates for every major structural change, and the fossils occur roughly but often not exactly in the expected order. Usually there are still gaps between each of the groups — few or none of the speciation events are preserved. Sometimes the individual specimens are not thought to be directly ancestral to the next-youngest fossils i. However, they are assumed to be closely related to the actual ancestor, since they have intermediate morphology compared to the next-oldest and next-youngest “links”.

The major point of these general lineages is that animals with intermediate morphology existed at the appropriate times, and thus that the transitions from the proposed ancestors are fully plausible. General lineages are known for almost all modern groups of vertebrates, and make up the bulk of this FAQ.

Index to Creationist Claims

Scientific measurements such as radiometric dating use the natural radioactivity of certain elements found in rocks to help determine their age. Scientists also use direct evidence from observations of the rock layers themselves to find the relative age of rock layers. Specific rock formations are indicative of a particular type of environment existing when the rock was being formed.

The rejection of dating by religious fundamentalists is easier for them to make, but harder for them to demonstrate. The fossils occur in regular sequences time after time; radioactive decay happens, and repeated cross testing of radiometric dates confirms their validity.

Sedimentary Rocks slowest to form, and weather the fastest! The material is deposited in layers that will eventually form the sedimentary rock. These may be transported, usually by water or wind in the case of sand and deposited to form sediments. These become buried under later forming sediments and water or by major tectonic activity, and then become subjected to compression as enormous pressures are created deep in the crust from the weight of rocks or sediments above them.

Over millions of years from the fragments of eroded pre-existing rocks, water is squeezed out and the particles cement together with the help of dissolved salts and silica crystallising out. Other changes come about depending on the type of material from which the sedimentary rock is formed. It then becomes compressed under the weight of water and other sediments and the water is squeezed out and the particles cement together. These rocks are clearly layered and crumble easily.

Fossil Inferences

Acknowledgements What is wrong with antievolutionist arguments via quotations? Any competent biologist is aware of a multitude of problems yet unresolved and of questions yet unanswered. After all, biologic research shows no sign of approaching completion; quite the opposite is true. Disagreements and clashes of opinion are rife among biologists, as they should be in a living and growing science.

A sedimentary rock is defined and what sedimentary rock formations look like. The formation of the sedimentary rocks sandstone, limestone, chalk, shale, mudstone, coal, salt deposits. The formation of fossils is described and why they mainly occur in sedimentary rocks and their usefullness to geological scientists studying the age of rocks and to biologists and zoologists studying the.

The complex of data recorded in fossils worldwide—known as the fossil record —is the primary source of information about the history of life on Earth. Smilodon; sabre-toothed tigerA discussion of California fossils—notably those of sabre-toothed tigers and the Smilodon—in the University of California Museum of Paleontology’s collection on the Berkeley campus.

Displayed by permission of The Regents of the University of California. Only a small fraction of ancient organisms are preserved as fossils, and usually only organisms that have a solid and resistant skeleton are readily preserved. Most major groups of invertebrate animals have a calcareous skeleton or shell e. Other forms have shells of calcium phosphate which also occurs in the bones of vertebrates , or silicon dioxide. A shell or bone that is buried quickly after deposition may retain these organic tissues, though they become petrified converted to a stony substance over time.

Unaltered hard parts, such as the shells of clams or brachiopods, are relatively common in sedimentary rocks , some of great age. Dinosaur fossils found in Alberta, Canada. Solutions may fill the interstices, or pores, of the shell or bone with calcium carbonate or other mineral salts and thus fossilize the remains, in a process known as permineralization. In other cases there may be a total replacement of the original skeletal material by other mineral matter, a process known as mineralization, or replacement.

Fossils and Geologic Time

At the time that Darwin’s On the Origin of Species was published, the earth was “scientifically” determined to be million years old. By , it was found to be 1. In , science firmly established that the earth was 3.

Part 1A. A large, but by no means complete, list of transitional fossils that are known. Use this article to counter the common creationist canard that there are no intermediates in the fossil record.

This rock contains a fossilized stalked crinoid. Scientists study fossils of plants, animals, and other organisms in order to better understand what life was like on Earth many years ago and how it has changed over time. Fossils are important evidence for the theory of evolution. Examples of fossils include bones, teeth, and impressions.

By studying fossils, evidence for evolution is revealed. Paleontologists compare the features of species from different periods in history. Evolution of the horse.

4.8 Fossils

The fossils are from fresh rock of a deep highway cutting, and have been metamorphosed to upper greenschist facies like their matrix. Despite metamorphic alteration, total organic carbon of the samples was 0. Organic outlines of the fossils are also accentuated by recystallized berthierine and opaque oxides.

Articles home page Creation vs. Evolution 0. Introduction and table of contents The following is an organized presentation on the creation vs. evolution controversy.

Relative dating Studies of strata , the layering of rocks and earth, gave naturalists an appreciation that Earth may have been through many changes during its existence. These layers often contained fossilized remains of unknown creatures, leading some to interpret a progression of organisms from layer to layer. Lomonosov’s ideas were mostly speculative.

In the Comte du Buffon tried to obtain a value for the age of Earth using an experiment: He created a small globe that resembled Earth in composition and then measured its rate of cooling. This led him to estimate that Earth was about 75, years old. Other naturalists used these hypotheses to construct a history of Earth , though their timelines were inexact as they did not know how long it took to lay down stratigraphic layers.

This was a challenge to the traditional view, which saw the history of Earth as static,[ citation needed ] with changes brought about by intermittent catastrophes.

Creation vs. Evolution

January Fossils provide a record of the history of life. Smith is known as the Father of English Geology. Our understanding of the shape and pattern of the history of life depends on the accuracy of fossils and dating methods. Some critics, particularly religious fundamentalists, argue that neither fossils nor dating can be trusted, and that their interpretations are better. Other critics, perhaps more familiar with the data, question certain aspects of the quality of the fossil record and of its dating.

These skeptics do not provide scientific evidence for their views.

PROCEDURE C:! The sketches below are of index fossils from specific geologic time periods. Cross Section 4 is from four different locations in New York State.

Primary source references As a preface to this document, I want to point out that it is a shame that we have to continue to refute the same arguments that evolutionists keep bringing up over and over again in their attempts to argue against the fact of creation, which fact has been well established since the day the earth was created ex nihilo several thousand years ago. It is also a shame that the masses have bought all this based on some circular reasoning about fossils, where fossils tend to be found buried, similarities between various life forms, the presence of certain decay products in rocks, and other inherently speculative arguments about the past, based on phenomena that exist in the present.

If I hope to accomplish anything, it will be to simply encourage critical thinking. One must get past the arguments ad populum that its popularity counts for something , ad hominem that if you attack the person making the argument, this counts for something , and especially ad baculum that there are people who have the clout to decree it as true , to ask the key questions and challenge the unsubstantiated assumptions and thinking of those who would hold to the evolution position.

Today there are an increasing number of anti-creationist authors who are producing books and periodicals that make this relatively brief presentation insufficient to deal with all the points in dispute. Those defending creation today who don’t have the time to devote their life’s study to gaining expertise in all fields of inquiry must principally be prepared to think critically, logically, and challenge unsubstantiated assumptions made by these people.

They must also keep a level head in the face of some vicious attacks and diatribes that will be directed against them, as is advised in the scriptures 1 Peter 3: By way of definitions, I want to point out that when I speak of “evolution,” I am referring to the popular contemporary use of the word, which in a nutshell is the belief that all life forms are related by ancestry, and that the first life form occurred spontaneously, all due to completely natural processes.

When I speak of “creation,” I am referring to the inherently obvious fact that the origin of all life forms can be attributed to a creator who purposefully created them with planning and intent, and the documented fact that this occurred over the course of a week’s time several thousand years ago. This document is not a scientific thesis, but an apologetic intended to be submitted and defended by me in an interactive, online electronic forum.

I claim no copyright on this document, and grant its use to the public domain. I have not written it with a view towards receiving any sort of financial or other personal gain, and I request that others utilizing this document do likewise. Those copying and disseminating this document shall assume full responsibility for defending it.

Dating Rocks with Fossils

Hello! Do you want find a partner for sex? Nothing is more simple! Click here, registration is free!